Menu

Dear FHFA

This topic contains 7 replies, has 3 voices.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2445

    Investors Unite
    Keymaster

    Dear FHFA,

    For nearly a century, Fannie Mae (and her younger cousin Freddie Mac) have been providing liquidity to the housing market. This has allowed many more Americans to obtain affordable mortgages (often with long-term, fixed-interest rates) and purchase their own homes. This in turn has boosted housing sales and related services. Sales and services can account for up to 20% of GDP. Thus the GSEs (Fannie and Freddie) have been instrumental in stimulating the economy and supporting the American Dream of home ownership.

    Even in the darkest days of the Great Recession of 2008, the GSEs (with the help of a big infusion of capital from the Treasury) continued to supply liquidity to the housing market; thus, preventing the Great Recession from becoming another Great Depression. During the recession, the GSEs were virtually the only source of capital in the mortgage marketplace. Today, they still provide over 80% of all home mortgages.

    The GSE system functioned as it was designed with the support of the Treasury and the guidance of the FHFA during conservatorship. The GSEs successfully carried out their role of providing money for mortgages, before, during, and after the 2008 crisis. Fannie and Freddie have returned to profitability and have repaid all funds borrowed from the Treasury with interest. Currently, though quite profitable, the GSEs cannot build a capital buffer as the Treasury continues to illegally confiscate all profits even after their loan was repaid in full plus interest. Fannie and Freddie have literally repaid their debt to society and should be released from conservatorship.

    Several bills in Congress (which purport to seek stability in the market place) would wind-down Fannie and Freddie and hand their business over to the “Too-Big-To-Fail” banks which caused the 2008 recession. This is counter-intuitive. A much simpler, wiser, and proven solution is to end the profit sweep and let the GSEs recapitalize. This would bolster stability, allowing Fannie and Freddie to continue to provide liquidity and affordable mortgages to the market place. The result will be a healthier economy with more opportunities to achieve the American Dream of home ownership.

    Sincerely,
    Link

    #2446

    Investors Unite
    Keymaster

    Dear FHFA,

    Thank you for helping to keep Fannie Mae alive and returning the company to prosperity. Fannie Mae is so important to me. It was because of Fannie Mae that I was able to get a mortgage and buy a home. Also, I have my retirement fund invested in Fannie Mae. I really need that nest egg. I am 57 years old, and work part-time as a waitress and part-time as a dog sitter. It has taken some time for me to build up my savings. I am nearing retirement age and can not afford to lose my retirement fund; therefore, I need my Fannie Mae stock to retain or increase value. Thank you again.

    #2447

    Investors Unite
    Keymaster

    Dear FHFA,

    As a FMCC shareholder, and as a real estate broker of almost 40 years, I believe that the FHFA should set goals of 1) Relisting the FMMC and FNMA stock; 2) Removing both entities from conservatorship; and 3) Shelving any proposals to wind down the GSEs ASAP. My view of the housing crises and resulting GSE financial problems is that the GSE’s problems were not as much a result of GSE practices as they were the result of the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, i.e., deregulation, which resulted in a wide variety of ill-conceived new lending products and fraudulent activity by mortgage lenders, their underwriters, investment bankers, and rating agencies, all of whom worked together to dupe the GSEs into buying substandard loans. This must be the case given the record amount of cash settlements between the aforementioned and the FHFA. Accordingly, if the GSEs were not at the root of the problem, why should they be wound down and why should American homebuyers and GSE shareholders be punished?

    Some people believe that FMCC and FNMA represent too great of a systemic risk to be allowed to survive. Such fears are unfounded, as the GSE system has roots going back to the housing collapse during the Great Depression, and the system seems to have worked well for more than 50 years before the repeal of Glass-Steagall led to the crack binge of bad lending practices that ultimately sank the mortgage market and caused the housing collapse. Winding down the GSEs without damaging the housing market is a pipe dream since the GSEs probably represent 80% or more of the secondary market, and there wouldn’t be enough private entities to fill the void left by their demise, which would be sure to drive up lending costs thereby reducing housing affordability. Furthermore-and most important-one of the reasons that the GSEs have been so successful in being able to attract the vast amounts of capital necessary to conduct their operations is because of the explicit backing of the full faith and credit of the US Government. Huge funds all around the world that buy the GSE’s paper are required by their investment criteria to only buy US Government guaranteed paper, which means that most such investors couldn’t buy private agency debt even if they wanted to, which means that private agencies couldn’t raise the capital necessary to efficiently run the nation’s secondary mortgage market.

    The FHFA should set goals to honor the terms of the FNMA and FMCC conservatorship and restore them to profitability because winding them down will damage shareholders, investors, homeowners, and the American economy.

    Ronald

    #2448

    Investors Unite
    Keymaster

    Dear FHFA,

    “I’m concerned about recent proposals that would wind down Fannie and Freddie, because these institutions are an indispensable part of making home ownership affordable. Proposals to eliminate that GSEs would be disruptive to mortgage markets, threaten home ownership, and be at odds with the responsibilities of FHFA as the conservator of these institutions under the HERA statute.

    Also, I am upset about the government’s conservatorship, which was not intended to be permanent. It could have placed them into receivership but did not. HERA, passed by Congress and signed into law by the President, prescribes FHFA’s duty to conserve value for shareholders and to nurture the institutions back to profitability. Shareholders have rights under the constitution, and FHFA has responsibilities under the law – and both preclude the Treasury’s decision in 2012 to take 100% of profits on an ongoing basis, which permanently undercapitalizes the institutions and does not allow investors any return on their investments.

    I want the government to immediately stop the illegal Third Amendment Sweep and allow the GSEs to begin rebuilding their capital base. Fannie and Freddie should be released from conservatorship now.”

    -Mark

    #2449

    Investors Unite
    Keymaster

    Dear FHFA,

    I think the only “goal” that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should have is to accept only good, quality mortgages for bundling into mortgage-backed securities. That is how any privately-owned company should operate. I think FHFA should release the companies from conservatorship and once again make them part of the private sector.

    To give these companies any other “goal” … like accepting substandard mortgages, mortgages from non-credit worthy applicants, mortgages from certain areas of the country, etc. is to invite another financial crisis.

    -Jeff

    #2460

    halohat
    Participant

    Dear FHFA,

    I am a taxpayer.
    I am an investor.
    I am a home owner.
    I am a voter.
    I am a working class person.

    As an investor I believe I pay more taxes than the average person so it irritates me to hear others say I am a “bottom feeder” or something along those lines because I invest in FnF. The stock is for sale legally. I am not so sure it is legal to offer a stock when behind closed doors in advance it is stated my investment will never act as a positive return when in fact the stock is among, if not thee most profitable company in the world.

    As a real estate broker for 10 years I know what FnF were and what they could be now when everyone is acting fairly. Good for all, win win. Those who thought FnF needed “bailing out” they have been made whole and then some [many billions for goodness sakes!] It is past time to release FnF and relist.

    I will vote again.

    #2523

    Investors Unite
    Keymaster

    Dear FHFA,

    “I’m concerned about recent proposals that would wind down Fannie and Freddie, because these institutions are an indispensable part of making home ownership affordable. Proposals to eliminate that GSEs would be disruptive to mortgage markets, threaten home ownership, and be at odds with the responsibilities of FHFA as the conservator of these institutions under the HERA statute.

    Also, I am upset about the government’s conservatorship, which was not intended to be permanent. It could have placed them into receivership but did not. HERA, passed by Congress and signed into law by the President, prescribes FHFA’s duty to conserve value for shareholders and to nurture the institutions back to profitability. Shareholders have rights under the constitution, and FHFA has responsibilities under the law – and both preclude the Treasury’s decision in 2012 to take 100% of profits on an ongoing basis, which permanently undercapitalizes the institutions and does not allow investors any return on their investments.

    I want the government to immediately stop the illegal Third Amendment Sweep and allow the GSEs to begin rebuilding their capital base. Fannie and Freddie should be released from conservatorship now.”

    -Matt

    #3446

    kingbrian1980
    Participant

    Every day I wake up and can’t believe the government has stolen from me. I am beyond outraged, I can’t get over the fact my money is gone because of Uncle Sam. I vow like Bill Ackman to go to whatever it takes to expose this government theft. Our forefathers did not have this sort of government control in mind. Why is the constitution not being upheld? This kind of reckless self dealing the government has engaged in only creates immense hatred when our rights are thrown out the window. I will one day tell my grandchildren that yes I had made legit investment but your United States Treasury believe it or not outright STOLE IT some years later with a sweep amendment, in addition they concocted countless lies and deception tactics to cover it up. The greatness of America is no longer so. We are no better than the former Soviet Union.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. You can login with the username and password you provided when you signed up. If you do not have a username click here to sign up.