Menu

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Never been better

Home Discussion Recent News Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Never been better

This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  inthetube 1 year, 1 month ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4751

    dpsims
    Participant

    America’s mortgage-insurance giants are making bigger profits than before the crisis
    Feb 20th 2015 | LONDON AND NEW YORK | Business and finance

    FANNIE Mae and Freddie Mac may sound like a couple living in suburban America but they are in fact two of the country’s more unusual listed companies. With a government-backed guarantee, Fannie and its sibling Freddie buys mortgages from lenders and packages them for resale.

    Looking at the headlines, it may seem that both Fannie and Freddie are in financial trouble again. On February 19th, Freddie Mac reported a sharp decline in its net income last year, which fell from $48.7 billion to $7.7 billion. The next day, on February 20th, Fannie Mae also announced a big fall in earnings. Falling market interest rates forced the pair to declare losses from their derivatives on their accounts, although the impact of this will even out in the long term.

    But the fact still remains that both Fannie and Freddie have emerged from the financial crisis churning out more profits before tax than they ever have before (see chart). Who benefits most from this is a subject of controversy. The government, having bailed out Fannie and Freddie in 2008, owns most of the pair. Other shareholders own 20%, but Barack Obama’s administration in effect expropriated these stakes in 2012: virtually all earnings now go to the Treasury. Two challenges to this arrangement are before federal courts. Critics contend that the government is sowing the seeds of another crisis by encouraging both firms to loosen their lending standards for political reasons. But in the meantime the American government can look forward to some healthy dividends from the pair.

    http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21644525-americas-mortgage-insurance-giants-are-now-making-bigger-profits-financial-crisis

    #4753

    dpsims
    Participant

    Government takes 100% of the profits and the shareholders get 0%. This is what you call a 100% tax rate. OR a complete nationalization of the housing market.

    Taxpayers have been paid back. It will soon be close to $230 billion paid to Treasury vs $187.5 billion in principal and accrued interest.

    #4756

    inthetube
    Participant

    Hi David,

    I read the same article over the weekend, perhaps you and/or Mr. Pagliara (I will email him separately, he’s not too active on the boards) can write a letter to the Editor and/or invite them over for an interview to give the shareholder’s point of view. No need for me to point out the factual inaccuracies in the article, it looks like the author did not do any of his homework.

    There should be a very good article in all of this and The Economist, as a newspaper that believes in Economic Liberalism, including basic rules of capitalism such as: Investors who invest in companies should be able to see a return in the form of a dividend and governments cannot seize profitable private companies as they please ‘for the public good’.

     

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.